<div dir="ltr"><br><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 7:56 PM, marcel.taeumel <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:Marcel.Taeumel@hpi.de" target="_blank">Marcel.Taeumel@hpi.de</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Hi David,<br>
<br>
you have a point there. However, this requires discipline. I am thinking<br>
about better tool support for code that might lack this kind of<br>
code-centered architecture. The Squeak image is full of objects and only<br>
part of it are code artifacts classes or methods. In the spirit of<br>
DataStream (ReferenceStream), serialized project files, or the *.image file<br>
itself, we need tools for working with objects that are not code.<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>+1</div><div> </div><div>Best,</div><div>Karl </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<br>
Best,<br>
Marcel<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
--<br>
View this message in context: <a href="http://forum.world.st/swapMouseButtons-broken-in-trunk-tp4881884p4883303.html" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://forum.world.st/swapMouseButtons-broken-in-trunk-tp4881884p4883303.html</a><br>
<div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5">Sent from the Squeak - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.<br>
<br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div></div>