<div dir="ltr"><div><span style="line-height:1.5">-- </span><br></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr">On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 10:44 AM marcel.taeumel <<a href="mailto:Marcel.Taeumel@hpi.de">Marcel.Taeumel@hpi.de</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">fniephaus wrote<br>
> How about:<br>
><br>
> ...<br>
> - final (new release)<br>
> ---------------------------<br>
> - alpha + build number<br>
> - beta + build number (as soon as there is a release manager / we are<br>
> working towards a new release)<br>
> - rc1, rc2, ... (release candidates built or approved by release manager)<br>
> - final (new release)<br>
> ---------------------------<br>
> ...<br>
><br>
> If we agree that the next version should be called for example 5.2, it<br>
> will<br>
> be called 5.2 all along the release process except if we decide it should<br>
> be a major release. Then we do the renaming in or after the release<br>
> candidate phase. Example: 5.2 alpha-X, 5.2 beta-X, [ major release<br>
> decision<br>
> ], 6.0 RC1, 6.0 Final.<br>
><br>
><br>
> On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 10:27 AM Tobias Pape &lt;<br>
<br>
> Das.Linux@<br>
<br>
> &gt; wrote:<br>
><br>
>><br>
>> On 28.06.2016, at 09:36, marcel.taeumel &lt;<br>
<br>
> Marcel.Taeumel@<br>
<br>
> &gt; wrote:<br>
>><br>
>> > Eliot Miranda-2 wrote<br>
>> >> On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 10:25 AM, Ben Coman &lt;<br>
>> ><br>
>> >> btc@<br>
>> ><br>
>> >> &gt; wrote:<br>
>> >><br>
>> >>> Release To Manfacture<br>
>> >>><br>
>> >><br>
>> >> I much prefer "final".<br>
>> >><br>
>> >><br>
>> >><br>
>> >>><br>
>> >>> On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 1:01 AM, Eliot Miranda &lt;<br>
>> ><br>
>> >> eliot.miranda@<br>
>> ><br>
>> >> &gt;<br>
>> >>> wrote:<br>
>> >>>><br>
>> >>>><br>
>> >>>> On Sat, Jun 25, 2016 at 4:05 AM, H. Hirzel &lt;<br>
>> ><br>
>> >> hannes.hirzel@<br>
>> ><br>
>> >> &gt;<br>
>> >>> wrote:<br>
>> >>>>><br>
>> >>>>> +1 Makes sense.<br>
>> >>>>><br>
>> >>>>> BTW, what does Rtm stand for?<br>
>> >>>><br>
>> >>>><br>
>> >>>> I'd like to know this too. No one seems to have answered this yet.<br>
>> >>> What<br>
>> >>>> does "Rtm" mean? I know what RTFM means. Doesn't seem to fit here<br>
>> ;-)<br>
>> >>>><br>
>> >>>>><br>
>> >>>>> And how will minor maintenance releases be marked, which happen<br>
>> from<br>
>> >>>>> time to time?<br>
>> >>>>><br>
>> >>>>> As Tobias writes<br>
>> >>>>><br>
>> >>>>> SystemVersion current<br>
>> >>>>><br>
>> >>>>><br>
>> >>>>> does not return an 'alpha' suffix, this should be fixed.<br>
>> >>>>><br>
>> >>>>><br>
>> >>>>> --Hannes<br>
>> >>>>><br>
>> >>>>> On 6/22/16, marcel.taeumel &lt;<br>
>> ><br>
>> >> Marcel.Taeumel@<br>
>> ><br>
>> >> &gt; wrote:<br>
>> >>> images,<br>
>> >>> doesn't<br>
>> >>> I<br>
>> >>> that,<br>
>> >>> them<br>
>> >>> can<br>
>> >>><br>
>> <a href="http://forum.world.st/Renaming-Squeak-s-system-version-from-Squeak-alpha-to-SqueakTrunk-tp4902398p4902424.html" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://forum.world.st/Renaming-Squeak-s-system-version-from-Squeak-alpha-to-SqueakTrunk-tp4902398p4902424.html</a><br>
>> >>>>><br>
>> >>>><br>
>> >>>><br>
>> >>>><br>
>> >>>> --<br>
>> >>>> _,,,^..^,,,_<br>
>> >>>> best, Eliot<br>
>> >>>><br>
>> >>>><br>
>> >>>><br>
>> >>><br>
>> >>><br>
>> >><br>
>> >><br>
>> >> --<br>
>> >> _,,,^..^,,,_<br>
>> >> best, Eliot<br>
>> ><br>
>> > RTM is not needed. After rc_n comes alpha plus the release with no<br>
>> suffix.<br>
>><br>
>> I thought alpha always precedes rc's?<br>
>><br>
>> :D<br>
>><br>
>> ><br>
>> > Best,<br>
>> > Marcel<br>
>><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>><br>
<br>
Again, there is no need for "final" because the release itself does not need<br>
a suffix. It has its own repository, a version number, and usually also a<br>
build number.<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Agreed. I wouldn't put "final" in the version string, so when I see a 6.0, I know it is final. :)</div><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<br>
Only for the trunk versions, we need alpha, beta, rc to distinguish feature<br>
freeze and code freeze. "beta" is feature freeze and "rc" is code freeze.<br>
<br>
Best,<br>
Marcel<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
--<br>
View this message in context: <a href="http://forum.world.st/Renaming-Squeak-s-system-version-from-Squeak-alpha-to-SqueakTrunk-tp4902398p4903794.html" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://forum.world.st/Renaming-Squeak-s-system-version-from-Squeak-alpha-to-SqueakTrunk-tp4902398p4903794.html</a><br>
Sent from the Squeak - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.<br>
<br>
</blockquote></div></div>