<div dir="ltr">Hi Henry.<div>I decided to ask this questions here.</div><div><br></div><div>What the advantage to use your security solution instead of legacy secure sockets which is available in the image? (implemented with ZdcSecureSocketStream)</div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">2017-10-24 18:33 GMT+02:00 henry <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:henry@callistohouse.club" target="_blank">henry@callistohouse.club</a>></span>:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div>Hi all,</div>
<div>
    <br>
</div>
<div>I am happy to announce the release of version 3.5 of ParrotTalk, for Squeak and Pharo, found here:</div>
<div>
    <br>
</div>
<div><a href="http://www.squeaksource.com/Cryptography/ParrotTalk-zzz.2.mcz" target="_blank">http://www.squeaksource.com/<wbr>Cryptography/ParrotTalk-zzz.2.<wbr>mcz</a>
    <br>
</div>
<div>
    <br>
</div>
<div>It follows this specification:</div>
<div><a href="https://github.com/ZiroZimbarra/callistohouse/blob/master/docs/ParrotTalkFrameDesign-3.5.pdf" target="_blank">https://github.com/<wbr>ZiroZimbarra/callistohouse/<wbr>blob/master/docs/<wbr>ParrotTalkFrameDesign-3.5.pdf</a>
    <br>
</div>
<div>
    <br>
</div>
<div>One item of note, in version 3.5, the system connecting to a server, sending the IWant msg, must know the vatId of the system being connected to. I am considering changing this to version 3.6 by removing one round-trip in messaging. Therefore,
    these messages would be combined: IWant/GiveInfo, IAm/ReplyInfo. I will keep ProtocolOffered and ProtocolAccepted to allow eLindaSession to support both versions: 3.5 and 3.6.</div>
<div>
    <br>
</div>
<div>Thoughts please?</div>
<div>
    <br>
</div>
<div class="m_2258111289134810303protonmail_signature_block">- HH</div><br><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div>