<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<font face="Georgia">I think the same and this is one of the issues
with categories: they are slices along one axis. If you prefer a
different axis, categories are often all wrong.</font><br>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 12/14/18 9:12 AM, karl ramberg
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAGzzWLhXw-+iUe2hp9sALJWQX=hK9jBdiTxUdFWpi5OevBooOg@mail.gmail.com">
<div dir="ltr">Isn't that 'testing' category for like querying the
object/morph for properties? Like 'wantsSteps', isMorph etc.
<div>So not for SUnit testing.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>So maybe the category should be named something else to not
confuse.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Cheers,</div>
<div>Karl</div>
<div><br>
</div>
</div>
<br>
<div class="gmail_quote">
<div dir="ltr">On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 10:17 AM <<a
href="mailto:patrick.rein@hpi.uni-potsdam.de"
moz-do-not-send="true">patrick.rein@hpi.uni-potsdam.de</a>>
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote">Hi everyone,<br>
<br>
while going through the categorizes of Morphic I noticed (or
re-discovered) the fact that stepTime and wantsSteps are both
in the category 'testing'. While I figured out that this is
the case at least since Squeak 3.3, I find this very odd. I
would have expected both methods in the category 'stepping and
presenter' to which they belong.<br>
<br>
Are there any good reasons for keeping the methods in that
category?<br>
<br>
On that note: The 'testing' category of Morphic contains
several other apparently misplaced methods such as #knownName,
#renameTo, #renameInternal:. If no one feels strongly about
the membership of these selectors in these categories, I will
go ahead in a few days and recategorize them.<br>
<br>
Bests<br>
Patrick<br>
<br>
</blockquote>
</div>
<br>
<fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
<pre class="moz-quote-pre" wrap="">
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>