<body><div id="__MailbirdStyleContent" style="font-size: 10pt;font-family: Arial;color: #000000">
I think that CodeHolder should work with single instances of CompiledMethod or MethodReferences already. There should be no need for MethodHolder ... If not, CodeHolder would be just like a Workspace holding some code expressions. At least, I do not consider CodeHolder as an abstract superclass. :-)<div><br></div><div>Best,</div><div>Marcel</div><div class="mb_sig"></div><blockquote class="history_container" type="cite" style="border-left-style:solid;border-width:1px; margin-top:20px; margin-left:0px;padding-left:10px;">
<p style="color: #AAAAAA; margin-top: 10px;">Am 12.06.2019 22:18:05 schrieb Tim Johnson <digit@sonic.net>:</p><div style="font-family:Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif">Hi,<br><br>I noticed that MethodHolder is only used by classes in the <br>Etoys-Scripting category (Player and ScriptEditorMorph).<br><br>On its class side, it only has methods in the *Etoys protocol.<br><br>So, considering this, might it also belong in Etoys-Scripting rather <br>than in Tools-Base?<br><br>Thanks,<br>Tim J<br><br><br><br></div></blockquote>
</div></body>