<div dir="ltr"><div>Hi Marcel,</div><div><br></div><div>It was actually Firefox 39 and Chrome 45 on OS X 10.6. It just seemed strange that a site that doesn't seem to have any real need for (or provide value in making) hard-line security cutoffs would choose to do so. (i.e. sites from <a href="http://google.com">google.com</a> to <a href="http://pharo.org">pharo.org</a> don't do that... why should <a href="http://squeak.org">squeak.org</a>?) Put another way: what's the rationale for not keeping less secure, or even totally unencrypted, options available to keep the site as accessible as possible?</div><div><br></div><div>For my situation, I was able to just switch to a different system. But had the only thing available been a device with an old browser that couldn't (conveniently or otherwise) be upgraded, it would have been quite annoying.</div><div><br></div><div>Thanks,</div><div>Phil</div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 2:39 AM Marcel Taeumel <<a href="mailto:marcel.taeumel@hpi.de">marcel.taeumel@hpi.de</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div><div id="gmail-m_3820508890712724986__MailbirdStyleContent" style="font-size:10pt;font-family:Arial;color:rgb(0,0,0)">
Hi Phil,<div><br></div><div>so, you have Firefox version 48 installed in OS X (10.6)?</div><div><br></div><div>Best,</div><div>Marcel</div><div></div><blockquote type="cite" style="border-left-style:solid;border-width:1px;margin-top:20px;margin-left:0px;padding-left:10px">
<p style="color:rgb(170,170,170);margin-top:10px">Am 10.10.2019 03:49:21 schrieb Phil B <<a href="mailto:pbpublist@gmail.com" target="_blank">pbpublist@gmail.com</a>>:</p><div style="font-family:Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif">
<div dir="ltr">I ran into this issue and wasn't sure if it was intentional or not: I was attempting to get to <a href="http://squeak.org" target="_blank">squeak.org</a> from an old version of OS X (10.6) and neither Firefox or Chrome versions for Snow Leopard are able to render even the main page. Firefox hangs and Chrome reports ERR_SPDY_INADEQUATE_TRANSPORT_SECURITY.<div><br></div><div>While I appreciate that supporting the latest and greatest from an SSL standpoint (assuming that's what's going on) is a good thing, it seems overkill to prevent older systems from using the site. Most other sites large and small still work with both browser versions I tried from at least a basic HTML standpoint... Javascript support is less consistent.</div><div><br></div><div>For now I'll just switch to a different system to get what I need but thought it was worth reporting.</div></div>
</div></blockquote>
</div></div><br>
</blockquote></div></div>