<html><head></head><body>
<p>Are there instructions for building Bochs, Nicolas?<br/>
tyk, r<br/>
</p>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 3/4/20 10:50 AM, Robert wrote:<br/>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite" cite="mid:b2279499-eb60-0877-5c51-46691762d670@pm.me">
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8"/>
<p>Hi yo hehr, Nicolas,<br/>
</p>
<p>I tried the first block, in the simulation window, but it was
missing BochsIA64 or some. I then ran the third block, a StackVM
as you suggested. I ran it against my Cryptography repair image,
rabbit, and very slooowly reselected the tests and ran them, in
proogrress...<br/>
<br/>
We sure would be appreciating etwas help, as if there was a
little angel out there who offers plugin repair and SHA512
code/plugin. Praying for an angel! <br/>
<br/>
tyk, r<br/>
</p>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 3/4/20 8:50 AM, Nicolas Cellier
wrote:<br/>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite" cite="mid:CAKnRiT6LyGRb8Dqjpe34kDaLFedoDy3X2LZHdCLY2EPSxQPQKA@mail.gmail.com">
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html;
charset=UTF-8"/>
<div dir="ltr">
<div>Hi Robert,</div>
<div>normally, most of VM/plugins development should take
place with the VM-simulation from within the
SpurVMMaker.image (unless the plugin extensively call C
functions from external libraries).</div>
<div>You will find a Worksapce with some simulation examples.</div>
<div>Then you might detect the error from within Smalltalk
with debuggers etc...<br/>
</div>
<div>I recommend simulating a Stack VM for a beginning (or
you'll need to compile the Bochs plugin, which is currently
difficult on linux...).<br/>
</div>
</div>
<br/>
<div class="gmail_quote">
<div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">Le mer. 4 mars 2020 à 14:40,
Robert via Squeak-dev <<a href="mailto:squeak-dev@lists.squeakfoundation.org" moz-do-not-send="true">squeak-dev@lists.squeakfoundation.org</a>>
a écrit :<br/>
</div>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px
0.8ex;border-left:1px solid
rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
<div>
<p>Hi Levente,<br/>
<br/>
Yes, I see what you are saying. Without the Crypto
plugins, all the Crypto tests run green. <br/>
<br/>
With the Crypto plugins, things get messed up. ByteArray
class>>#fromHexString: still completes, but the
KeyHolder>>#key SEG-FAULTS the vm (called from <b>CryptoRC2Test>>#testARC2</b>).
Additionally, the following two tests fail: <b>CryptoDESTest>>#testDESCBC</b>
and <b>CryptoDESTest>>#testTripleDESCBC.</b> <br/>
<br/>
The SEG-FAULT comes from this code:<br/>
<br/>
KeyHolder new<br/>
data: KeyHolderData new;<br/>
encryptKey: #(0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0)
asByteArray;<br/>
key<br/>
<br/>
tyk, r<br/>
</p>
<div>On 3/4/20 8:10 AM, Levente Uzonyi wrote:<br/>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre>Hi Robert,
I just ran all test cases of Cryptography-v5.3-rww.118.mcz in a fresh 5.3
image on 64-bit linux using the stock VM (no Cryptography plugins), and
all the tests are green.
ByteArray class >> #fromHexString: and methods sent by it were last
modified in 2010, and they do not accept non-hexadecimal digits in the
input string.
Levente
On Wed, 4 Mar 2020, Robert via Squeak-dev wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre>In squeak 5.3, building ByteArrays from HEX strings are now failing,
after years of passing within the Cryptography tests.
The first doIt works, while the other two are now failing in the
#readHexFrom: method...
PASSING
ByteArray fromHexString: '06a9214036b8a15b512e03d534120006'
FAILING
ByteArray fromHexString: '16rc286696d887c9aa0611bbb3e2025a45a'
ByteArray fromHexString: '00000000 00000000'
This is causing multiple test failures in the Cryptography test suite.
tyk, r
</pre>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
</div>
<br/>
</blockquote>
</div>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
</body></html>