<body><div id="__MailbirdStyleContent" style="font-size: 10pt;font-family: Arial;color: #000000">
Hi Jakob.<div><br></div><div>> <span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-size: 13px">It might be more useful to have an integration test though</span></div><div><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-size: 13px"><br></span></div><div><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-size: 13px">Does the setup in DebuggerTests help for that?</span></div><div><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-size: 13px"><br></span></div><div><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-size: 13px">Best,</span></div><div><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-size: 13px">Marcel</span></div><div class="mb_sig"></div><blockquote class="history_container" type="cite" style="border-left-style:solid;border-width:1px; margin-top:20px; margin-left:0px;padding-left:10px;">
<p style="color: #AAAAAA; margin-top: 10px;">Am 19.04.2020 18:04:04 schrieb Jakob Reschke <forums.jakob@resfarm.de>:</p><div style="font-family:Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif">I think there were already similar tests, so I added another.<br><br>It might be more useful to have an integration test though: remote<br>control a debugger to create a new method and check the generated<br>source.<br><br>Without any such tests, the only way to detect regressions is to check<br>manually, and nobody will explicitly check for this, right?<br><br>Am Sa., 18. Apr. 2020 um 14:54 Uhr schrieb Thiede, Christoph<br><christoph.thiede@student.hpi.uni-potsdam.de>:<br>><br>> I like Tools-jr.956! However, I still see very little value in these tests ...<br>><br>><br>> Best,<br>><br>> Christoph<br>><br>> ________________________________<br>> Von: Squeak-dev <squeak-dev-bounces@lists.squeakfoundation.org> im Auftrag von commits@source.squeak.org <commits@source.squeak.org><br>> Gesendet: Sonntag, 12. April 2020 11:36:20<br>> An: squeak-dev@lists.squeakfoundation.org<br>> Betreff: [squeak-dev] The Inbox: ToolsTests-jr.95.mcz<br>><br>> A new version of ToolsTests was added to project The Inbox:<br>> http://source.squeak.org/inbox/ToolsTests-jr.95.mcz<br>><br>> ==================== Summary ====================<br>><br>> Name: ToolsTests-jr.95<br>> Author: jr<br>> Time: 12 April 2020, 11:36:19.948623 am<br>> UUID: 00bf69cd-641f-a849-b226-6249774e46dc<br>> Ancestors: ToolsTests-mt.94<br>><br>> Add test for argument name if the argument is a block.<br>><br>> See Tools-jr.956<br>><br>> =============== Diff against ToolsTests-mt.94 ===============<br>><br>> Item was added:<br>> + ----- Method: DebuggerExtensionsTest>>testBlockGeneralize (in category 'tests - canonical argument names') -----<br>> + testBlockGeneralize<br>> + | outer |<br>> + outer := nil.<br>> + self assert: 'Block' equals: [] canonicalArgumentName;<br>> + assert: 'Block' equals: [{outer. self}] canonicalArgumentName.!<br>><br>><br>><br><br></commits@source.squeak.org></squeak-dev-bounces@lists.squeakfoundation.org></christoph.thiede@student.hpi.uni-potsdam.de></div></blockquote>
</div></body>