<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN"><html><head><meta content="text/html;charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type"></head><body ><div style="font-family: Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 10pt;"><div>Hi Folks,<br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>I have used ApacheMQ(?) and Stomp in squeak to communicate between squeak and a C++ application, it worked well, but I would like to avoid this for my project.<br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>What I (will) have is a pharo image that will parse a large XML document for me (squeak has FileSystem incompatabilities that SAXHandler etc need) .<br></div><div><br></div><div>During a SAXHandler callback, I want to kick this to an image that will parse some data using a PEG grammar I wrote and that needs some automated testing to perfect.<br></div><div><br></div><div>Communication I would like is pharo (sax) -> squeak(xtreams-parsing).<br></div><div><br></div><div>Some basic reading showed rST from about 2005? as a possibility as well as Nebraska,which I believe has been removed from Squeak several releases ago.<br></div><div>I have used neither of them.<br></div><div><br></div><div>If there is not a method I can make work, then I will do pharo(sax/stomp)->ApacheMQ->squeak(stomp/xtreams-parsing), but I prefer a pure smalltalk mechanism.<br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>I still have a textbook of mpq(?) queues from a course I really enjoyed and pharo(sax)->squeak(queueing)->squeak(xtreams-parsing) would be really cool.<br></div><div><br></div><div>thx in advance.</div><div><br></div></div><br></body></html>