[Squeakfoundation]OK, what exactly should thisSqueakFoundation thing
be and do?
Wed, 25 Apr 2001 21:10:39 -0400
While talking about chaordic process, you might also want to look at Charles Savage's "Fifth Generation Management, Co-creating through Virtual Enterprising, Dynamic Teaming and Knowledge Networking" and Peter Senge's (old) "The Fifth Discipline: The Art & Practice of The Learning Organization "
We can use Squeak News site as well, at least as a mirror.
We can also have a column there that discusses issues related to theSqF.
Is there anything else done towards SqF so far? Or is this the only activity about it?
Dwight Hughes wrote:
> I'll have to look a little deeper into the chaordic process -- the precepts
> look good, I'm just not sure how one goes about properly applying all of
> them in practice yet.
> I definitely think SqF's domain should be much broader than just being the
> support site for Stable Squeak. The primary contribution of SqF to the
> world of Squeak should be "professionalism" - applying, creating,
> contributing, and striving for the best professional standards in all
> aspects. Stable Squeak will certainly be a major part of this (and will be
> SqF's "baby" most likely), but so should support of the "dream" - the SqC
> bleeding edge Squeak. Of course, it will be very important to feed the
> improvements in Stable Squeak back into SqC Squeak and vice versa, and to
> do what we can to make this possible. A hard fork is in nobody's best
> interest, and Stable Squeak must not be allowed turn into Stagnant Squeak.
> I don't see SqF competing with http://www.squeakland.org/ at all -- I see
> this as an entirely different domain from where SqF should be (not what
> they are trying to do so much as the audience being addressed).
> -- Dwight
> At 03:42 AM 04/25/2001, Cees de Groot wrote:
> >Nice formulation, Dwight. I put it on the Swiki; I also outlined the steps of
> >the "Chaordic Design Process" (Create Your Own Chaordic Organization In Six
> >Hard Steps ;-)) on the Swiki's front page.
> >I do think this part of the CDP has its merits: concentrate on your goals
> >first, and only when everyone agrees check what the possible means are. From
> >Dwight's formulation (which I think is a great first definition) it is
> >clear that the SqF will be broader than pampering Stable Squeak...
> Squeakfoundation mailing list