[Squeakfoundation]An architecture for sustainable Squeaking
Sat, 2 Jun 2001 23:38:32 +0300
Joseph Pelrine <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> At 18:05 02.06.2001 , email@example.com wrote:
> >Joseph Pelrine <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> > > You're right, modularity is not everything, but it's a big step in the
> > > right direction. If you want to check out some good reference sources,
> > > start out by reading
> >[snip yummy references]
> > > More recent work can be found in Gamma et al.'s Paper on TeamStreams,
> > > presented at XP 2000 (I'm not sure whether there's a web link to it),
> >I think this is it -
> Definitely not that paper! I don't know what those guys think they're
> doing, but it ain't XP.
>However, they have a reference to Gamma et al.'s
> paper in there.
Yup, that (and being in XP200X) is what tricked me. My bad.
> >I miss having the RB and friends. One thing I missed in those was
> >something telling me my code is too complex - enter the HintingBrowser.
> >Someday soon I hope to have all those together on one image with
> Huh? I use the RB all the time for my Squeak work. I even call it from
> SUnit to wrap quality control tests in my work. Contact Bob Hartwig - he
> did the port, and is doing the StSq version too.
Last time I looked, the Squeak port wasn't fun(ctioning). I tried in the
StSq prerelease, and extract method (the smoke test) doesn't work. First
codePane wasn't set to the TextMorph, after fixing that manually. The
refactoring itself asserted in a case that should have worked.
You're saying this should work?
> - Joseph Pelrine [ | ]