[Squeakfoundation]A Draft for the Relationship Between SqF and SqC.

[Jimmie Houchin]

I believe many like myself will agree with Cees here.

Because of the tremendous potential of Squeak to be our "vision enabler"
or "empowerer" we would like Squeak to be able to enable us in our
pursuits which fall outside SqC's perview but not excluding SqC's
pursuits.

Most of us here have our jobs and our lives outside of our employment. I
would truly love to use Sqeak for my web development. Outside of that I
have many, many personal projects that Squeak enables better than any
other tool I currently know of.

I am a homeschooling father of 7+ (addition in around October). Squeak
can be a very enabling tool for ideas and projects in that arena.

I believe synergy and cooperation with SqC is exactly what is being
looked for and most earnestly desired.

In this end the sum of Squeak can be greater than it's parts.

Just one man's opinion. But then again maybe not. :)

Jimmie Houchin

Cees de Groot wrote:
> 
> tim@sumeru.stanford.edu said:
> > Since this is so close to what I have wanted to see, how could I
> > possibly say anything other than 'bravo, yippee, exactly'?
> 
> Hmm. That leaves just a "metoo" to me...
> 
> BTW Dan: I love and very much subscribe to the purpose/goals/ideas of SqC, so
> as far as I would be involved with SqF I would try to make absolutely sure
> that that work isn't disturbed in any way (apart from the small issues popping
> up in any transition, of course).
> 
> --
> Cees de Groot               http://www.cdegroot.com     <cg@cdegroot.com>
> GnuPG 1024D/E0989E8B 0016 F679 F38D 5946 4ECD  1986 F303 937F E098 9E8B