[Squeakfoundation]Proposal: vote for Purpose
Cees de Groot
Thu, 03 May 2001 10:14:50 +0200
> Well, there are a few other proposals and I do not see any reason to
> restrict a "vote" to the proposal which was selected by you. A strange
> way to start SqF ...
I did this to keep discussion flowing. Someone (a role I like to call Chief
Whip) has to do that. I revisited the proposals on the Swiki page, and this
was the only one that combined in a single sentence the essence of what I
think everyone thinks that the SqF should be. The other proposals on the page
all seem to be "older versions".
Now, it would be strange if I'd pick one and say "that's the one". But I
/proposed/ one, mainly because discussion stopped. Judging by the fact that
three of the four respondents agree with both the proposing and the proposal,
it doesn't seem to be that unreasonable a step.
Cees de Groot http://www.cdegroot.com <email@example.com>
GnuPG 1024D/E0989E8B 0016 F679 F38D 5946 4ECD 1986 F303 937F E098 9E8B