Cees de Groot
Fri, 11 May 2001 21:24:53 +0200
> Well, the process sounds intrigueing (sp?) somehow, but I have
> problems with the strict top down approach
It's only the first iteration. I think it is a very sensible order to think
about what you want to be, without too much context. When you're down the list
for the first run, next iterations will probably a bit less order and more
> It's just that in my experience the chances of success are
> proportional to the inverse square of the number of people involved
> (similar to the collective IQ of a group ;-) ); but then, people often
> characterize me as a pessimist ...
One of the stronger points of a chaordic organization is that it attempts to
reverse that relation. The basic rule is "put responsibilities at the lowest
possible level", which is easy to say but hard to execute...
Cees de Groot http://www.cdegroot.com <email@example.com>
GnuPG 1024D/E0989E8B 0016 F679 F38D 5946 4ECD 1986 F303 937F E098 9E8B