[Squeakfoundation]A Possible Process/Product for the Squeak Foundation

[Dan Shafer]

I like this approach a lot. I keep thinking of SqC as the R&D group, SqD (I
agree we need a better set of labels all around) as the product development
group, and SqF as the marketing and sales group. With the added wrinkle, of
course, that the product development is largely "outsourced."

The release plan seems _exactly_ right to me.
--- Dan Ingalls <Dan.Ingalls@disney.com> wrote:
> >I'm hoping by the weekend to put out a list of projects and processes that I
> can imagine taking place between SqF and SqC in the next 6 months to a year. 
> This may seem out of sequence in the chaordic plan, but my hope is to load
> our cache with some of the situations we (at least I) will want to deal with,
> so that the orderly plan goes forward with these in mind.
> 
> (Oh, you thought I meant last weekend? ;-)
> 
> I want to start by acknowledging John Sarkela for undertaking to test what
> could be a very workable Squeak Foundation release process.  And Dave Thomas
> for encouraging him to do so.
> 
> What John did was to dismantle the current release, parition it into various
> packages to a certain extent, make some important replacements (unrestricted
> fonts, for instance), and get the whole thing working again.  You have to
> pick a fixed point for this, and you can't have a bunch of other people
> participating very easily (though this should change as we strengthen the
> partitioning into real name spaces).
> 
> This is what SqC should do at each release, but neither do we have the time
> nor the focus (we've got focus, but it's usually elsewhere).  Therefore I
> really think it's something SqF should do.  Here's my hope for how Squeak
> releases might get made once SqF is underway:
> 
> 	The base image is nicely built up from modules
> 		Starts as a micro kernel suitable for building simple headless apps.
> 		Adds enough programming environment to have fun on PDA's
> 			(like present majorShrink but less cruft)
> 		Adds a package mechanism
> 		Adds all the stuff in 3.1 as packages corresponding
> 			roughly to the major system categories
> 	All the SqD's (Squeak developers, of which SqC is one one) contribute the
> 		latest version of their work in the form of one or more
> 		packages as phase 1 of a release.
> 	As part of each major release, SqF undertakes the
> 		process of integrating these as best they can,
> 		writing or suggesting more documentation,
> 		and sending tentative releases back to the SqD's in
> 		some sort of alpha, beta, gamma test cycle.
> 	At the end of this cycle, SqF puts out any number of release
> 		images (probably a tiny, and a jumbo at least),
> 		and all the final packages as approved by the SqD's.
> 		Also a set of VMs for each platform of significance.
> 		(Some of these may be assembled elsewhere, but
> 		SqF is the clearinghouse for shoppers)
> 	Each of the SqD's may also maintain and distribute their own
> 		possibly more current versions of special-interest
> 		images (Siren is an existing example of this).
> 
> It's not rocket science.  In fact I anticipate a certain amount of anti-pink
> backlash about this rather mundane vision.  But here's my feeling about that.
>  It's much easier to convene an organization around well-specified stuff that
> has to get done, than it is around a bunch of blue-sky research ideas. 
> Especially if you have no funding.
> 
> This doesn't mean giving up on blue-plane progress.  This community is full
> of good people with good ideas for cool directions to go with Squeak.  Think
> of the pink plane as soil and fertilizer.  If we do our job on the pink
> plane, a thousand blue flowers will bloom there next year.
> 
> And if there is a decent open process in place (the above is more open than
> what SqC now does), then the mainline Squeak will follow the blue successes
> faster than it does now.  That would be a Good Thing.
> 
> 	- Dan
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Squeakfoundation mailing list
> Squeakfoundation@lists.squeakfoundation.org
> http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/listinfo/squeakfoundation


=====
------- Dan Shafer, Author and Community Consultant
^. .^ | Commentator on Community, Web Building, Nanotech
 ='=  | Sr. Co-Editor, Online Community Report
      | Author, NanoTech, MegaQuake: Business Implications of
Squeak| Nanotechnology (Spring 2002), Wiley, ISBN 047120045X
------- http://www.gui.com (major update Spring 2001)

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Auctions - buy the things you want at great prices
http://auctions.yahoo.com/