Sun, 13 May 2001 17:10:25 +0200
Cees de Groot wrote:
> Joern.Eyrich@brokat.com said:
> > Well, the process sounds intrigueing (sp?) somehow, but I have
> > problems with the strict top down approach
> It's only the first iteration. I think it is a very sensible order to think
> about what you want to be, without too much context. When you're down the list
> for the first run, next iterations will probably a bit less order and more
Hm, I was thinking we were trying to progress from chaos in the
beginning to order later.
I guess I should have read a bit more about chaordism before starting
to discuss it...
As nobody else seems to have problems with it and discussion is
flowing again, I'll do my best to go along with it.