Cees de Groot
Sun, 13 May 2001 22:01:35 +0200
> I have plagiarised the statement fof principles from the GEODATA
> link. I
> personally feel that they have would fulfill our needs better than
> the NAMA
Thanks for the work. Did you put it on the Swiki? (retorical question, I just
checked. It'd be nice if you could put it on, so we could use it as a starting
point for collaborative editing).
I'm not to sure though about item I ff. Apart from the absence of a definition
of "Squeak design", some attempts at fitting in a definition really didn't
bring up anything that clicked with me. This whole part feels "foreign" to me
(save from some useful single items).
Furthermore, but I may be standing alone in this, I still think that regarding
Squeak as an ecosystem rather than a bit of intellectual property is the right
way to approach this subject. Am I alone in this?
Cees de Groot http://www.cdegroot.com <firstname.lastname@example.org>
GnuPG 1024D/E0989E8B 0016 F679 F38D 5946 4ECD 1986 F303 937F E098 9E8B