[Squeakfoundation]Ad-hoc final harvesting for 3.4

Daniel Vainsencher squeakfoundation@lists.squeakfoundation.org
Tue, 10 Dec 2002 12:44:08 +0300


Ok, then that's my position too - consider adding Torge's selection code
into 3.5a, after some more inspection. 

About ParensBlinking, I wonder - why shouldn't it stay a package?

Daniel

Avi Bryant <avi@beta4.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> On Mon, 9 Dec 2002, Daniel Vainsencher wrote:
> 
> > Avi, it's not clear whether you've looked at Torge's code, or just want
> > the functionality. If not, could you have a look and let us know what
> > you think?
> 
> Daniel,
> 
> I didn't have time to thoroughly audit the code.  It does look reasonable
> and well factored, and it comes with SUnit tests, so I generally trust it.
> However, it does touch an awful lot of code (7 classes and lots of
> methods), and given that I would recommend bringing it in for 3.5 rather
> than 3.4.
> 
> Avi
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Squeakfoundation mailing list
> Squeakfoundation@lists.squeakfoundation.org
> http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/listinfo/squeakfoundation