New update stream (was Re: [Squeakfoundation]Order of business ...)
squeakfoundation@lists.squeakfoundation.org
squeakfoundation@lists.squeakfoundation.org
Sat, 16 Nov 2002 00:52:16 +0300
Hi Scott.
We got no answers from you on:
danielv@netvision.net.il wrote:
> Hi Guides (fellow Squeakers in the audience? ;-)
>
> Three issues we should start moving on, IMO:
> 1. Process to take physical ownership of updates.
> * Scott/SqC - do you have any remaining agenda for 3.4a/3.2.1, to
> settle before handing over the "keys"?
> * Scott, are you interested in some role (as vaguely ;-) postulated by
> goran, or otherwise) under the guidance (sic) of us Guides?
> * If neither of the above, can you explain the current existing tools
> in the image for handling this and the required resources, so we can
> plan a clean transition?
How do you prefer to proceed?
And if the last, then on the technical side -
> I assume basically we'll need some public readable, Guides writeable
> storage space on updates.squeakfoundation.org, and a final update on
> both all current servers and versions that changes the urls currently in
> the image. Am I missing something?
Daniel