[Squeakfoundation]Flow integration

Tim Rowledge squeakfoundation@lists.squeakfoundation.org
Thu, 21 Nov 2002 15:42:39 -0800


Andreas.Raab@gmx.de is claimed by the authorities to have written:

> Forgot one thing:
> > > I'm not qualified to answer about the benefits of the new primitive
> > > interfaces, I'm quite ignorant in these things. John M has (IIUC) spoken
> > > in favor of it. Could we get some more input from the experts?
> 
> I'd be interested in finding out how feasable it is to implement the flow
> socket primitives in a non-threaded way. On PS/2 for example, or any *nix with
> broken pthreads. The code looks like it is relying heavily on a threaded
> implementation.
Me too, even though Craig is convinced we can actually do threads on
Acorn. I'm not so sanguine about it....

tim
-- 
Tim Rowledge, tim@sumeru.stanford.edu, http://sumeru.stanford.edu/tim
Change is inevitable....except from vending machines.