Should "Weakness weakness" hold up 3.5? (Was: RE:
[Squeakfoundation]Re: [UPDATES] 3.5gamma)
bvukmer at blackboard.com
Thu Apr 3 09:40:15 CEST 2003
For folks that haven't been following this too closely:
The bug that Andreas's fix addressed was: "adding inst var to ClassDescription breaks ClassBuilder" ( http://minnow.cc.gatech.edu/squeak/3058 ). According to Andreas, this bug only happened when one re-compiled Behavior, ClassDescription, or Class. This bug was an obstacle for Nathanael Scharli's Traits project. That bug appears to be fixed.
Tim discovered a separate bug, caused by how ClassBuilder validates the matchup between superclass format and subclass format during recompilation of a "variable" class with at least one "weak" subclass. I posted a tentative fix. I am not at all sure how many ways one could break that class-format validation logic. The format validation check may well need more logic for matching the various class formats ( the original logic was "if newType ~~ oldType then throw error" ).
From: Daniel Vainsencher [mailto:danielv at netvision.net.il]
Sent: Thu 4/3/2003 8:21 AM
To: squeakfoundation at lists.squeakfoundation.org
Cc: The general-purpose Squeak developers listSubject: [Squeakfoundation]Re: [UPDATES] 3.5gamma
<shifting to sqf list>
That's an interesting point. Does that mean we actually delay 3.5, when
the 3.6 update stream has already started? another question is, how did
we get into gamma, when apparently, one of our two goals for the release
isn't actually achieved?
Tim Rowledge <tim at sumeru.stanford.edu> wrote:
> Daniel Vainsencher <danielv at netvision.net.il> wrote:
> > AFAICT, this fix is KCP territory. Unless there is a very good reason
> > otherwise, I would await their recommendation (and not delay the
> > release).
> Well since the 3.5 release was purported to be mostly to include a fix
> for a very similar bug and the bug in question has pretty similar
> effects - cannot recompile a number of classes - I'd say that without a
> fix we really shouldn't even consider 3.5 in beta in any meaningful
> Tim Rowledge, tim at sumeru.stanford.edu, http://sumeru.stanford.edu/tim
> Spellchecker not found. Press -- to continue ...
Squeakfoundation mailing list
Squeakfoundation at lists.squeakfoundation.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 5459 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lnx-12.ams-2.theinternetone.net/pipermail/squeakfoundation/attachments/20030403/5a92a89f/attachment.bin
More information about the Squeakfoundation