[Squeakfoundation]Re: Sublicensing seems possible
Tim Rowledge
tim at sumeru.stanford.edu
Fri Apr 4 17:38:27 CEST 2003
On Friday, April 4, 2003, at 04:25 PM, Andreas Raab wrote:
>> Since they were modifying and extending the system they _had_
>> to release those changes under the SqueakL just like the rest
>> of us.
>
> Slight correction: Squeak-L is not viral. It does not require you to
> release
> modifications under Squeak-L. All it requires is to make the code
> "publicly
> available".
That could actually be a problem in some cases. Say developer X
releases some system changes as required but insists on the GPL. They
have been publically released but are effectively unusable within the
main system. And I suppose that in a sense it would 'block' us from
implementing the same thing unless one could prove it clean. Ugly.
Perhaps we need to assert that 'publically available' is interpreted as
'usable in the main public image'.
tim
--
tim at sumeru.stanford.edu
More information about the Squeakfoundation
mailing list