[Squeakfoundation]Re: Trouble with 5150UUID-fix

[Cees de Groot]

I fear I have lost the context of this discussion; but if the issue can 
be cleanly fixed by publishing a class from SqueakMap, which is quite 
likely going to land in the distribution image anyway, and that fix is 
cleaner/better than mine (which is quite possible, because my fix 
squarely sits in the 'quick hack' category), I'm all for it.

Scott Wallace wrote:

> Cees, Doug, Tim, and all,
>
> Gentlemen, how do you wish to proceed on this?
>
> Thanks,
>
>   -- Scott
>
> At 9:50 AM -0800 12/24/02, Tim Rowledge wrote:
>
>> In message <p05100303ba2925931ccd@[10.0.1.7]>
>>           Scott Wallace <scott.wallace@squeakland.org> wrote:
>>
>>>  I presume that the appropriate fix at this point is to publish the
>>>  TimeStamp class, which is currently in the SqueakMap code, to the
>>>  3.4b update stream.  Any objections?
>>
>> Weel we could use the alternative approach and remove the dependency on
>> said class; what effect would that have on the usefulness of the uuid
>> value?
>>
>> tim
>> tim
>