[Squeakfoundation]Re: Trouble with 5150UUID-fix
Cees de Groot
Thu, 02 Jan 2003 10:40:00 +0100
I fear I have lost the context of this discussion; but if the issue can
be cleanly fixed by publishing a class from SqueakMap, which is quite
likely going to land in the distribution image anyway, and that fix is
cleaner/better than mine (which is quite possible, because my fix
squarely sits in the 'quick hack' category), I'm all for it.
Scott Wallace wrote:
> Cees, Doug, Tim, and all,
> Gentlemen, how do you wish to proceed on this?
> -- Scott
> At 9:50 AM -0800 12/24/02, Tim Rowledge wrote:
>> In message <firstname.lastname@example.org>
>> Scott Wallace <email@example.com> wrote:
>>> I presume that the appropriate fix at this point is to publish the
>>> TimeStamp class, which is currently in the SqueakMap code, to the
>>> 3.4b update stream. Any objections?
>> Weel we could use the alternative approach and remove the dependency on
>> said class; what effect would that have on the usefulness of the uuid