[Squeakfoundation]Harvester status for Marcus Denker

[Daniel Vainsencher]

Meaningfull tests for every class are a good goal, and the test server
will make them much more meaningful. OTOH, I don't think checking for a
class comment is a good use for a test, it's too wasteful. 

What I think we should do to improve these things is use SLint rules,
and have the test server run those too (in some future release, it's not
important to do this right now - most important is to start running
tests regularly). 

Daniel

Marcus Denker <marcus at ira.uka.de> wrote:
> There's actually a test in the Tests-package for that: I've done
> a Abstract testing-class called "ClassTestCase". 
> If you inherit from this one instead of TestCase (and name the test
> "<name of the class>Test", you get an error if the class-comment is empty.
> 
> (and you get 3 more tests: testNew, testUnCategorizedMethods, testRecompileAll)
> 
> There are not yet tests for every class in the system, but as soon as the
> testserver is running, I'l add more. 
> 
>         Marcus
> 
> -- 
> Marcus Denker marcus at ira.uka.de  -- Squeak! http://squeak.de
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Squeakfoundation mailing list
> Squeakfoundation at lists.squeakfoundation.org
> http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/listinfo/squeakfoundation