[Squeakfoundation]Collecting tests?

Daniel Vainsencher danielv at netvision.net.il
Sat Mar 1 13:27:03 CET 2003

Not yet. I'll give it a shot.


Marcus Denker <marcus at ira.uka.de> wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 01, 2003 at 01:59:32AM +0300, Daniel Vainsencher wrote:
> > Why generate a class? this could make things hard to find. Just make a
> > tool that adds a new method to "MiscTestCase". Maybe we won't accept
> > this mess into the image <g>, but it makes adding a test trivial, and if
> > it's good, it certainly can be maintained by someone on SM, and it's
> > very easy to factor it out into it's own class in time.
> > 
> Have you tried "Browser Unit Test Support" from SqueakMap?
> This definitly is a step in the right direction:
>  Summary: Adds some unit testing support facilities in the browsers
>  Author: Romain Robbes
>  Maintainer: Romain Robbes
>  Description:
>  This package adds a few buttons to the browsers in order to have a better
>  integration of unit tests during class developpement. It enables you to
>  easily switch back and forth from a class and it's unit test, allowing the 
>  same thing a the method level. It also adds a convenient way to run the 
>  test of the current class, giving automatic feedback to the user. Moreover, 
>  test creation is handled automagically if a class test/method test doesn't 
>  exist yet (don't worry, the choice is up to you :-)). Last and not least, 
>  it works for nearly all kinds of class browsers, and so integrates nicely 
>  with the RefactoringBrowser and the StarBrowser.
> Marcus
> -- 
> Marcus Denker marcus at ira.uka.de  -- Squeak! http://squeak.de
> _______________________________________________
> Squeakfoundation mailing list
> Squeakfoundation at lists.squeakfoundation.org
> http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/listinfo/squeakfoundation

More information about the Squeakfoundation mailing list