danielv at netvision.net.il
Sat Mar 1 13:27:03 CET 2003
Not yet. I'll give it a shot.
Marcus Denker <marcus at ira.uka.de> wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 01, 2003 at 01:59:32AM +0300, Daniel Vainsencher wrote:
> > Why generate a class? this could make things hard to find. Just make a
> > tool that adds a new method to "MiscTestCase". Maybe we won't accept
> > this mess into the image <g>, but it makes adding a test trivial, and if
> > it's good, it certainly can be maintained by someone on SM, and it's
> > very easy to factor it out into it's own class in time.
> Have you tried "Browser Unit Test Support" from SqueakMap?
> This definitly is a step in the right direction:
> Summary: Adds some unit testing support facilities in the browsers
> Author: Romain Robbes
> Maintainer: Romain Robbes
> This package adds a few buttons to the browsers in order to have a better
> integration of unit tests during class developpement. It enables you to
> easily switch back and forth from a class and it's unit test, allowing the
> same thing a the method level. It also adds a convenient way to run the
> test of the current class, giving automatic feedback to the user. Moreover,
> test creation is handled automagically if a class test/method test doesn't
> exist yet (don't worry, the choice is up to you :-)). Last and not least,
> it works for nearly all kinds of class browsers, and so integrates nicely
> with the RefactoringBrowser and the StarBrowser.
> Marcus Denker marcus at ira.uka.de -- Squeak! http://squeak.de
> Squeakfoundation mailing list
> Squeakfoundation at lists.squeakfoundation.org
More information about the Squeakfoundation