[Squeakfoundation] Allow MIT-licensed code to be part of "Squeak Official"?

[goran.krampe at bluefish.se]

Doug Way <dway at riskmetrics.com> wrote:
> Before we incorporate the SmaCC compiler into the base release (it's 
> already been approved), I thought I'd double-check this point.
> 
> Up until now, only Squeak-L licensed source code has been allowed to be 
> included in the base release.  (Base release meaning anything "Squeak 
> Official", including everything in the Full release.)  Submitted code 
> which doesn't specify a license is automatically licensed under 
> Squeak-L.  So if we incorporate SmaCC, we'll be changing this rule.

Yes, and I agree. MIT should be fine. So I vote for allowing it. But
only it.

regards, Göran