Google Group Re: [squeakland] Etoys developer chat log
korakurider at gmail.com
Tue Apr 27 01:45:06 EDT 2010
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 1:48 PM, Randall Caton <rcaton at cnu.edu> wrote:
> Dear Korakurider,
> I was planning to set up a Google Group for the GSoC project only and it
> would be a test. I would restrict the group to invited members. After
> reading the blog that seems the best move. What does the group think? If it
> doesn't work, we can abandon it.
my experience and comment was about public forum, not about closed
group like your GSoC project. It could be managed to run well if only
invited member can participate.
> Randy Caton
> On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 10:20 PM, Korakurider <korakurider at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 9:09 AM, Bert Freudenberg <bert at freudenbergs.de>
>> > * Maybe move all Squeakland mailing lists and forums to Google? would
>> > get rid of the forum spam issues
>> Really? My recent experience was bad because of spam mails.
>> See also http://ejohn.org/blog/google-groups-is-dead/
>> squeakland mailing list
>> squeakland at squeakland.org
> The views expressed in this email are my own
> and not necessarily those of CNU.
> Randall Caton
> 41596 Bald Eagle Drive
> Bigfork, MN 56628
> email: rcaton at cnu.edu
> web: www.pcs.cnu.edu/~rcaton
More information about the squeakland