<br><div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 11:21 PM, Ryan Macnak <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:rmacnak@gmail.com">rmacnak@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
<div>Thanks for the help, got a successful build.</div><div><br></div><div>commenting out longjump + Ubuntu 10.10 => builds but SqueakNOS gets stuck at a slash screen</div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>probably the VM crashed. In git version when squeaknos crashes it activates an output console to debug and see what the error was</div>
<div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;"><div>Ubuntu 10.4 => same undefined reference error</div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>yes, I think you also have to uncomment a line in the Makefile related to including this function from libc.</div>
<div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
<div>commenting out longjump + Ubuntu 10.4 => successful build</div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>excelent </div><div><br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
<div class="im"><div><br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin-top:0px;margin-right:0px;margin-bottom:0px;margin-left:0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204, 204, 204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex">
- if you are going to compile, I suggest cloning the latest git, we have worked for around a year on it so it is pretty much better (we shall release a new package soon anyway).</blockquote><div><br></div></div><div>Will this be Squeak 4.1 based? Also, what are the prospects of the kernel being based on the Cog Stack or Cogit vms?</div>
</blockquote><div><br></div><div>the git repo contains everything but image related stuff: helper scripts, handwritten C code, makefiles, grub to install in hard disk images. We started working on Squeak 3.9, then we moved to 4.1 and now we use Pharo, but all dialects should still work (we even tried cuis once and worked without big problems). I'll try to make a complete release tomorrow.</div>
<div><br></div><div>As for Cog, it should work just fine, but we haven't worked on it yet. The only thing that should be needed is to port the makefile, and for that we have to talk to Eliot to get some clues. </div>
<div>
<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
<br><div class="gmail_quote"><div class="im"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div>- maybe you don't need to compile the kernel at all. The idea is to work at high level, so only in counted cases should you recompile it.</div></blockquote><div><br></div></div><div>Of course, working at a high level is what makes it so appealing :) My interest is to produce a version of the SqueakNOS kernel that understands the Newspeak bytecodes. I am hoping that running the Newspeak branch of VMMaker on top of a version of SqueakNOS from circa Squeak 3.9 will not be too painful, or perhaps more likely, that I can add the bytecodes to the SqueakNOS's VMMaker.</div>
</div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Well, that would be a nice experience, I think that exploring security in NewspeakNOS can be really interesting hehe. Let us know what you find out.</div><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
<div class="gmail_quote">
<div><br></div><div>Thanks,</div><div>Ryan</div></div>
</blockquote></div><br>You're welcome.<div><br></div><div>Regards,</div><div> Javier.<br><div><br>-- <br>Javier Pimás<br>Ciudad de Buenos Aires<br>
</div></div>