[UI] Compiler messages
BSchwab at anest.ufl.edu
Sun Nov 11 14:37:09 UTC 2007
I will gladly give it a shot. What is the best way to distribute it?
Ideally, it should be part of the mainstream release so that the changes
will be maintained, but it might be easier to make it part of our
group's output. What do you think?
Which version of Squeak would you recommend as a starting point?
Wilhelm K. Schwab, Ph.D.
University of Florida
Department of Anesthesiology
PO Box 100254
Gainesville, FL 32610-0254
Email: bschwab at anest.ufl.edu
Tel: (352) 846-1285
FAX: (352) 392-7029
>>> gazzaguru2 at btinternet.com 11/11/07 9:20 AM >>>
You'll probably need to modify the "error correction" methods in the
class... perhaps some preferences would be in order (like "don't ask,
in Transcript instead" etc.).
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ui-bounces at lists.squeakfoundation.org
> [mailto:ui-bounces at lists.squeakfoundation.org]On Behalf Of Bill Schwab
> Sent: 11 November 2007 12:25 AM
> To: ui at lists.squeakfoundation.org
> Subject: [UI] Compiler messages
> Hello all,
> I am trying to get something done, so I thought it might be a good
> to insist on Squeak on Linux. Is there any way to gag the compiler
> messages that mess with me (in SERIES!!!!) about the unused variable
> names (I will need them as soon as I enter the debugger to start the
> real work) and confirming the method name that is not (YET) defined?
> The checks would be great, if not modal.
> Wilhelm K. Schwab, Ph.D.
> University of Florida
> Department of Anesthesiology
> PO Box 100254
> Gainesville, FL 32610-0254
> Email: bschwab at anest.ufl.edu
> Tel: (352) 846-1285
> FAX: (352) 392-7029
> UI mailing list
> UI at lists.squeakfoundation.org
UI mailing list
UI at lists.squeakfoundation.org
More information about the UI