[UI] We haven't discussed Host windows yet

[Gary Chambers]

Fair. I can understand that distinction, though in Squeak I apply those as
extensions to the model objects (at the moment).

-----Original Message-----
From: ui-bounces at lists.squeakfoundation.org
[mailto:ui-bounces at lists.squeakfoundation.org] On Behalf Of Jason Johnson
Sent: 06 September 2007 6:31 pm
To: Squeak's User Interface
Subject: Re: [UI] We haven't discussed Host windows yet


On 9/6/07, Gary Chambers <gazzaguru2 at btinternet.com> wrote:
> I find a simple MI (Model-Interactor) sufficient to be fair. The 
> chances of actually reusing controller code independently of current 
> usability expectations is small...

That's why I say MVP, not MVC.  The P stands for presenter, the controller
is just part of the View (as it should be imo).  The presenter is just a
basic description of how to present the domain/model objects, sort of like
Magritte.  It is also where all the "glue" code goes so that the Model and
View can be more clean.  At least as I understand it.
_______________________________________________
UI mailing list
UI at lists.squeakfoundation.org
http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ui