[UI] ToolBuilder

[Brad Fuller]

On Sun September 9 2007, Colin Putney wrote:
> On Sep 8, 2007, at 11:56 AM, Matthew Fulmer wrote:
> > You called my bluff. I don't have much experience debugging
> > Morphic code, but I did spend a few weeks hating the (self
> > changed: aSymbol) when debugging some browser code in both MVC
> > and Morphic, so my synopsis of Pluggable*Morphs was not
> > objective.
> >
> > Now that I actually look, I don't see more appropriate Morphs
> > than the Pluggable ones.
> >
> > Sorry for the noise.
>
> Well, I've lost some hair to Morphic as well, but I don't think
> you're wrong here. If things keep going as they are, OB will
> eventually have its own set of Morphic widgets. I'm having to
> override more and more of the base Pluggable*Morph behavior, and it's
> not hard to imagine a point where it's better to just subclass Morph
> directly. So there might not be a more "proper" way, but there
> probably *is* a better way.

AFAIC, if we could get rid of all the "pluggables" that would be nice. But, 
they are used everywhere.