[UI] Just a thought...

Igor Stasenko siguctua at gmail.com
Thu Apr 24 22:18:27 UTC 2008


i just discovered something which may be of you interest :)
http://wiki.squeak.org/squeak/3269
See 'melt' filter. I think you can use it for smearing background

2008/4/19 Gary Chambers <gazzaguru2 at btinternet.com>:
>
>
> Backwards compatability is always an issue, especially here. Wondering if we
> can really move things onwards now...
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ui-bounces at lists.squeakfoundation.org
> [mailto:ui-bounces at lists.squeakfoundation.org]On Behalf Of Michael van der
> Gulik
> Sent: 18 April 2008 4:44 AM
> To: Squeak's User Interface
> Subject: Re: [UI] Just a thought...
>
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 5:15 AM, Gary Chambers <gazzaguru2 at btinternet.com>
> wrote:
>
> > It might be nice that we have some more paint rules in BitBlt. A
> "fuzz/blur"
> > effect would be nice and take the load off the Squeak code for such
> things.
> >
> > Just wanting to get more contemporary with the ui look without large
> > performance penalties.
> >
> > Not quite liking the way that effects are hidden behind canvas (leading to
> a
> > bloated interface, perhaps (c.f. #drawImage... #drawTranslucentImage...)).
> > Not sure where the balance should be. Looks like a choke-point that is too
> > useful to bypass on a case-by-case basis.
> >
>
>
> If you were to implement some more interesting effects in BitBLT, how would
> you make sure that Morphs that use this code will still work on other
> targets such as Rome, Postscript Canvases, VNC etc?
>
> Gulik
>
>
> --
> http://people.squeakfoundation.org/person/mikevdg
> http://gulik.pbwiki.com/
> _______________________________________________
>  UI mailing list
>  UI at lists.squeakfoundation.org
>  http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ui
>
>



-- 
Best regards,
Igor Stasenko AKA sig.


More information about the UI mailing list