[V3dot10] And to 3.10

[Ralph Johnson]

On 1/21/07, Milan Zimmermann <milan.zimmermann at sympatico.ca> wrote:
> I think that it is the right thing to make teams responsible for approving
> fixes on Mantis for their category of responsibility. (Perhaps with a slight
> clarification of how the categories on Mantis map to each team, also
> this "mapping" may change once bigger chunks are maintained outside the
> image, but it seems the right principle to implement).

The main problem with this is that there are important categories of
classes for which there is no team responsible.  There is no "Kernel"
team, or "System" team, or "Collection" team, or "Tools" team.  I've
been told that most of the unresolved issues in Mantis are in these
categories, and that if there is a working team then they have been
taking care of things.

I would prefer to follow this approach, but it will mean forming some
more teams until all the image is covered.

-Ralph