[V3dot10] needed tool
David T. Lewis
lewis at mail.msen.com
Sat Jan 27 17:55:08 UTC 2007
On Fri, Jan 26, 2007 at 09:20:35AM +0100, G?ran Krampe wrote:
> > On 2007 January 25 05:32, Bert Freudenberg wrote:
> > Thanks. Back to Squeak for a sec, because all code (class, method) is now
> > separated to belong to exactly one Package, would it be possible (and
> > let's
> > assume first we are strongly typed in Squeak, so we know the receiver
> > always), to write a program which, by looking at senders and
> Mmm, just nitpicking but Squeak is strongly typed, it just isn't
> statically typed. I know the terms are a bit vague in definition though.
> > implementors,
> > would generate a "package dependency graph"? Am I missing something
> > substantial (I am sure I am :) ).
> > Thanks Milan
> As most of the time someone has already "been there and done that":
> Not sure though if MudPie actually analyzes senders/implementors, Daniel
> can surely describe it more (and you should be able to find plenty in
> squeak-dev archives).
Lex Spoon is also doing related work, see http://wiki.squeak.org/squeak/5711.
More information about the V3dot10