[V3dot9] Re: About condenseChanges and Traits

[Marcus Denker]

On 24.08.2006, at 13:32, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:

> Hi philippe
>
> are you telling to me that if I use that script in 7053
> I can get the problems we have with condenseChanges?
>

Hi,

We need to be careful what to talk about: There is

a) condenseChanges

and

b) condenseSources

What we did in 7053 is *condenseSources*. A condenseChanges
was *never* done, as far as I know, so i wonder why why talk about that?

So what needs to be done is

1) Verify that condenseChanges is correct.
For that
	- take 7052, do condenseChanges
        - take Philippe's code, see if problem.

I think the result will be that * condenseChanges*
is working correctly.

2) Verify that CondenseSources is broken
	- take 7052, do condenseSources
        - take Philippe's code, see if problem.

Then we are sure what we need to discuss... is
condense*Changes* or  condense*Sources* broken
or both?

> On 24 août 06, at 07:16, Philippe Marschall wrote:
>
>> problems := Dictionary new.
>> Smalltalk allClassesAndTraitsDo: [:class |
>> {class. class class} do: [:behavior |
>> behavior selectorsDo: [:selector |
>> (behavior sourceCodeAt: selector) ifNil: [
>> problems add: behavior -> selector ] ] ] ].
>> ^problems
>
> What I'm looking for is a way to avoid to do a condenseChanges to  
> be able to test
> what is breaking the condenseChanges.
>
> Stef_______________________________________________
> V3dot9 mailing list
> V3dot9 at lists.squeakfoundation.org
> http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/v3dot9

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 3938 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/v3dot9/attachments/20060824/3c186c0e/smime.bin