[V3dot9] Fwd: the Insidious Postscript: which fix line?

[stéphane ducasse]

Ok I will fix that!

Stef


Begin forwarded message:

> From: Peace Jerome <peace_the_dreamer at yahoo.com>
> Date: 18 juillet 2006 08:21:13 HAEC
> To: "stéphane" ducasse <ducasse at iam.unibe.ch>
> Subject: Re: the Insidious Postscript: which fix line?
>
>
>
> --- stéphane ducasse <ducasse at iam.unibe.ch> wrote:
>
>>
>> On 16 juil. 06, at 05:59, Peace Jerome wrote:
>>
>>> Hi stef,
>>>
>>> Cool. I noticed the postscript is gone for good in
>>> 7044.
>>>
>>> Please be sure to remove the 'fix' line I
>> suggested.
>>
>> which fix line?
>
> in the ScriptLoader>>generateCS: extensionAndNumber
> fromUpdate: updateNumber on: st
>
> you added the line:
>
> st nextPutAll: 'ChangeSet newChanges: ChangeSet new' ;
> cr.
>
> this is creating a new empty change set each time it
> is run.  (in 7046 we now have unnamed1..unnamed8)
>
> The theory was this would redirect the default
> changeset away from the changeset with the Insidious
> postscript.
>
> Now that we have proven that theory incorrect. And
> solved the major problem of the Insidious Postscript.
> That line should be removed and the extra unnamedn
> changesets eliminated. AFAIK that will clear the
> remaining minor problems.
>
>> I really do not understand what you are saying.
> Hmmm. I am sorry. We seem to be having language
> problems. I'll keep trying until I know how to say
> things so they are understood. I expect to get better
> with practice. Thanks for your patience.
>
>
> Yours in service, --Jerome Peace
>
>
>
>>
>>> It didn't work right in context and is producing a
>> new
>>> 'unnamed-n' changeset each time scriptloader is
>> run.
>>> This compared to the postscirpt is a minor
>> problem.
>>>
>>> Thanks for your efforts.
>>>
>>> Yours in service, Jerome Peace
>>>
>>> --- stéphane ducasse <ducasse at iam.unibe.ch> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Ok I finally understood your problem. Sorry I
>> will
>>>> remove it in the
>>>> next image.
>>>>
>>>> Stef
>>>
>>>
>>> Heh. It took me a while to understand and explain
>> the
>>> actual problem too. Its hard to debug at arms
>> length.
>>>
>>> Cheers, -- Jer
>>>
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com