[Vm-dev] Better type than void* for primitiveFunctionPointer?
andreas.raab at gmx.de
Tue Apr 15 19:41:05 UTC 2008
I think only Ian knows what "this stupidity" is. Also, I'm not fond of
profanity in code in general and would consequently just remove the
comment until an actual criticism / improvement is offered. This kind of
comment is not helpful and should be expunged whenever one is found.
tim Rowledge wrote:
> In Interpreter>declareCVarsIn: we currently have:-
> declareC: 'void *primitiveFunctionPointer'
> . "xxxx FIX THIS STUPIDITY xxxx - ikp. What he means is use a
> better type than void *, apparently - tpr"
> Anyone care to offer the better type than void* ? Speak now or stop
> whining later.
> tim Rowledge; tim at rowledge.org; http://www.rowledge.org/tim
> Fractured Idiom:- QUE SERA SERF - Life is feudal
More information about the Vm-dev