[Vm-dev] Re: Socket listening
piumarta at speakeasy.net
Tue Jul 1 15:03:59 UTC 2008
On Jul 1, 2008, at 6:35 AM, Bert Freudenberg wrote:
> which means the second socket listens successfully, but on a random
> port. I verified it is actually listening there using lsof. The
> SO_REUSEADDR option does not make any difference, btw.
> I think I should not rely on it. Also, the same code gives an error
> (as expected) on Windows.
The behaviour you're seeing seems broken to me; bind() should fail if
another socket is already bound to the same listening address. I'll
take a look.
More information about the Vm-dev