[Vm-dev] Re: [squeak-dev] More descriptive version report

[Ken Causey]

Or I might suggest 'generated using'.  However perhaps instead we should
simplify the version information.  What image was used to generate the C
code is only rarely of interest, remove it from the overall version
information and add a --verbose-version or the like with the current
information, maybe even more.

Ken

On Mon, 2008-10-06 at 18:49 -0300, Jecel Assumpcao Jr wrote:
> Janko Mivšek wrote:
> > So I propose that the version report is more descriptive, like:
> > 
> >    VM version: 3.10-1 #1 Thu Apr 10 14:52:07 PDT 2008 gcc 4.1.2
> >    built for image: Squeak3.10beta of 22 July 2007 [latest update: #7159]
> >    ...
> 
> I think "built using image: Squeak3.10beta..." would explain the
> situation better.
> 
> -- Jecel
> 
> 
> 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/vm-dev/attachments/20081006/d6b1c9f5/attachment.pgp