[Vm-dev] Integer overflow with BitBlt rule 20 and depth 32
David T. Lewis
lewis at mail.msen.com
Sat Oct 24 17:00:29 UTC 2009
On Sat, Oct 24, 2009 at 10:40:17AM -0300, Juan Vuletich wrote:
>
> What worries me a bit is the other changes I needed to do to be able to
> run the Smalltalk BitBlt simulation and to do the translation. These are:
> BitBltSimulator >> #oopForPointer: "May be harmless"
> CArrayAccessor >> #long32At: "Why is this needed?"
> CArrayAccessor >> #long32At:put: "Why is this needed?"
I am just guessing here, but I think that BitBltSimulator expects to
be used with an interpreter simulator, so perhaps if you initialize it
with a simulator there will be no need to add these methods.
sim := BitBltSimulator new setInterpreter: InterpreterSimulator new
Dave
More information about the Vm-dev
mailing list