[Vm-dev] Linux binaries
laurent laffont
laurent.laffont at gmail.com
Sun Apr 11 19:20:00 UTC 2010
Hi Ian,
Please, can you tell me
- which gcc version you use
- which CFLAGS option for configure script
tinyBenchmarks are better with you binaries than mine. I try to learn on
this.
Cheers,
Laurent Laffont
On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 3:13 AM, Ian Piumarta <piumarta at speakeasy.net>wrote:
>
> Dear Linux hackers,
>
> Does anyone have experience with making binary releases for 32-bit Linux
> that are compiled on a 64-bit system with -m32? My Linux development
> machine runs 64-bit Linux and it would be convenient to package 32-bit Linux
> VM binaries on that machine rather than remotely, or worse after rebooting
> into a 32-bit kernel. Any information or opinions, for or against, would be
> gratefully received!
>
> If anyone wants to play spot-the-difference:
>
> http://squeakvm.org/unix/release/Squeak-4.0.2.2181-linux_i386-1.tar.gz
> http://squeakvm.org/unix/release/Squeak-4.0.2.2181-linux_i386-2.tar.gz
>
> One of these was compiled on a 32-bit system, the other on a 64-bit system.
> (I already know they have slightly different collections of plugins. :) My
> 32-bit machine happily runs either.
>
> Cheers,
> Ian
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/vm-dev/attachments/20100411/255963d7/attachment.htm
More information about the Vm-dev
mailing list