[Vm-dev] [OT] why CoInterpreter and not CogInterpreter ?

Mariano Martinez Peck marianopeck at gmail.com
Sun Dec 12 18:52:41 UTC 2010


On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 7:18 PM, Eliot Miranda <eliot.miranda at gmail.com>wrote:

>
>
>
> On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 7:01 AM, Mariano Martinez Peck <
> marianopeck at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> Co is for co-exist ?  and not for cog ?
>>
>
> Because it coexists with the JIT.  Actually it's a co-dependency
> relationship; the JIT and it's generated code can't do without the
> CoInterpreter.
>

Ok...thanks for the clarification


>
> b.
> e.
>
>
>>
>> thanks
>>
>> mariano
>>
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/vm-dev/attachments/20101212/7863aa65/attachment.htm


More information about the Vm-dev mailing list