[Vm-dev] Re: Mac + Cog - mouse clicks

[Igor Stasenko]

On 24 December 2010 03:41, John M McIntosh
<johnmci at smalltalkconsulting.com> wrote:
> Apple is moving towards code signing for all binaries. The impact of that on independent developers is unknown. However in order to distribute squeak or a cog vm via the os-x app store everything has to be signed. This includes the Vm and all the plugin binaries.  One can choose to distribute outside the os-x app store, but I think? the community would like to see squeak and cog in the os-x store?
>

Well, i am new on the Mac field.
I hope Esteban having a developer license to sign our official
binaries in future, because i'm not in the mood of becoming a
'licensed' developer.
I am just a hacker who passing by :)

> On 2010-12-23, at 6:30 PM, Igor Stasenko wrote:
>
>> On 24 December 2010 02:51, John M McIntosh
>> <johnmci at smalltalkconsulting.com> wrote:
>>> Oh and btw you'll need to look into the signing logic, I'm not quite sure where that gem of copy protection sits but don't be surprised if
>>> Apple pursues it a bit more aggressively...
>>>
>>
>> well. i cut it out of my Cog on mac os.. because one don't needs a license.
>> On iOS does.. but Cog doesn't runs there :)
>> But correct me if i wrong.
>>
>>> mmm other thoughts.
>>> The plugins *could* be just the raw binaries ala unix builds. The only reason they were bundles is because in early 2000 era we ran os-9 and os-x flavors.
>>> That could be all dropped, and maybe just forgo creating plugin bundles.
>>>
>>>
>> Thanks for details, i added an issue ticket to not forget this.
>> (http://code.google.com/p/pharo/issues/detail?id=3480)
>
> --
> ===========================================================================
> John M. McIntosh <johnmci at smalltalkconsulting.com>   Twitter:  squeaker68882
> Corporate Smalltalk Consulting Ltd.  http://www.smalltalkconsulting.com
> ===========================================================================
>
>
>
>
>



-- 
Best regards,
Igor Stasenko AKA sig.