[Vm-dev] Re: Mac + Cog - mouse clicks
estebanlm at gmail.com
Fri Dec 24 02:54:21 UTC 2010
yeah... I will have one (already faxed the developer contract... yes, I need to fax it) :)
El 23/12/2010, a las 11:51p.m., Igor Stasenko escribió:
> On 24 December 2010 03:41, John M McIntosh
> <johnmci at smalltalkconsulting.com> wrote:
>> Apple is moving towards code signing for all binaries. The impact of that on independent developers is unknown. However in order to distribute squeak or a cog vm via the os-x app store everything has to be signed. This includes the Vm and all the plugin binaries. One can choose to distribute outside the os-x app store, but I think? the community would like to see squeak and cog in the os-x store?
> Well, i am new on the Mac field.
> I hope Esteban having a developer license to sign our official
> binaries in future, because i'm not in the mood of becoming a
> 'licensed' developer.
> I am just a hacker who passing by :)
>> On 2010-12-23, at 6:30 PM, Igor Stasenko wrote:
>>> On 24 December 2010 02:51, John M McIntosh
>>> <johnmci at smalltalkconsulting.com> wrote:
>>>> Oh and btw you'll need to look into the signing logic, I'm not quite sure where that gem of copy protection sits but don't be surprised if
>>>> Apple pursues it a bit more aggressively...
>>> well. i cut it out of my Cog on mac os.. because one don't needs a license.
>>> On iOS does.. but Cog doesn't runs there :)
>>> But correct me if i wrong.
>>>> mmm other thoughts.
>>>> The plugins *could* be just the raw binaries ala unix builds. The only reason they were bundles is because in early 2000 era we ran os-9 and os-x flavors.
>>>> That could be all dropped, and maybe just forgo creating plugin bundles.
>>> Thanks for details, i added an issue ticket to not forget this.
>> John M. McIntosh <johnmci at smalltalkconsulting.com> Twitter: squeaker68882
>> Corporate Smalltalk Consulting Ltd. http://www.smalltalkconsulting.com
> Best regards,
> Igor Stasenko AKA sig.
More information about the Vm-dev