[Vm-dev] Proposal to rename all CMakeVMMaker configuratiosn

[Esteban Lorenzano]

I agree

El 22/04/2011, a las 5:41p.m., Igor Stasenko escribió:

> 
> On 22 April 2011 21:38, Mariano Martinez Peck <marianopeck at gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 8:34 PM, Jeremy Kajikawa <jeremy.kajikawa at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Do you need to put "VM" into ALL of the config strings?
>>> 
>> 
>> Good point. I don't know. Maybe we don't need it.
>> 
>>> 
>>> How about ...
>>> <Machine>-<OS>-[Debug-]<SpecialOptions?>
>>> 
>> 
>> I like it :)
>> 
>>> 
>>> With examples like the following...
>>> 
>>> Cog-Windows
>>> Cog-Windows-Debug
>>> CogMT-Windows
>>> CogMT-Windows-Debug
>>> CogMT-Unix
>>> CogMT-Unix-NoGL
>>> CogMT-Unix-Debug-NoGL
>>> Stack-Windows
>>> Stack-Windows-Debug
>>> Stack-Windows-Debug-FixedVerSI
>>> Stack-Unix
>>> Stack-Unix-Debug
>>> Stack-Unix-Debug-FixedVerSI
>>> 
> You cannot use '-' in class name.
> However we can use underline.
> 
> 
> CogMT_Unix_Debug_NoGL
> 
> but then i think
> 
> CogMTUnixDebugNoGL
> 
> will be better.
> 
>>> Are these usable and readable by everyone?
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> I like this last change. For the prefix without the "VM" I am not sure. I don't have a strong position.
>> I would go with this one.
> 
> Yeah. VM can be omitted.
> 
>> 
>> Igor ? Esteban?  (since you are the guys that mostly maintain them)
>> 
> 
> I am fine with it.
> As to me, as long as things work i don't care much about naming. This
> stuff is not used too often and by many..
> But i agree that consistent naming is good to have, so if you have a
> time to spend on polishing this, do it :)
> 
> 
> -- 
> Best regards,
> Igor Stasenko AKA sig.