[Vm-dev] Fwd: [Pharo-project] Squeaksource.com

[Igor Stasenko]

+1.

lets do that.

Sidenote:
besides the inconvenience which makes us frequent collapse of SqS service,
I feel happy that smalltalk grown beyond the capacity which
squeaksource can handle.
Lets not forget that it served us well for years, thanks to people for
developed it and maintained it over the years.

So, lets solve this problem and move on.


On 31 August 2011 21:07, Andreas Raab <andreas.raab at gmx.de> wrote:
>
> +1.
>
> Cheers,
>   - Andreas
>
> On 8/31/2011 7:19, Alexander Lazarević wrote:
>
>
>
> When it looked like most of global open source Smalltalk development came to a halt last weekend because of squeaksource.com being down for about two days, I asked about moving vital parts like vmmaker to source.squeak.org . This would take some load from squeaksource.com (even if it is until there is a better alternative) and could make commits to vmmaker faster.
> As suggested I move the discussion to vm-dev.
>
> Alex
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Bert Freudenberg <bert at freudenbergs.de>
> Date: 2011/8/27
> Subject: [Pharo-project] Squeaksource.com (was: [squeak-dev] Re: Addition to "About Pharo" dialog)
> To: The general-purpose Squeak developers list <squeak-dev at lists.squeakfoundation.org>
> Cc: Pharo-project at lists.gforge.inria.fr
>
>
> On 26.08.2011, at 18:14, Alexander Lazarević wrote:
>
> Wouldn't it make also good sense to move some vital stuff like the vmmaker repo to this destination? I know this will be controversial, but the current situation is bad at best.
>
> That would be a good idea IMHO - you might ask what the other VM developers think of the idea on the vm-dev list.
>
>
>
>



-- 
Best regards,
Igor Stasenko AKA sig.