[Vm-dev] Cannot build Cog from the "blessed" repo at Gitorious
siguctua at gmail.com
Tue Jul 5 08:15:40 UTC 2011
On 4 July 2011 23:40, Mariano Martinez Peck <marianopeck at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 3:26 PM, Igor Stasenko <siguctua at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 4 July 2011 15:08, Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm at gmail.com> wrote:
>> > well... I disagree with that.
>> > Hudson server is for us, not for regular users. I does not has any value if we cannot check it agains our branch. I discussed this with Mariano many times... also, it doesn't has a any value if we cannot check it with latest sources (that's why my branch has "bleedingEdge" configured to build versions).
>> > maybe we need to create ALSO a "build with blessed" hudson config (and that one can be made with numbers instead bleedingEdge). But I want my build checking with my branch :P
>> > (I know, you didn't change my builds, just yours... I'm just telling why I will not change mine, he)
>> I don't see any problems.
>> Can you add jobs to build cocoa vms using blessed repository?
>> So, you can commit things locally and then they will be built using
>> yours, and when everything is working , you push to blessed and it
>> builds VM to check everything is ok.
> Exactly. That's what we always come to when I discussed with Esteban. The only "problem" here is that we will have to duplicate Hudson projects: one for stable versions for final users and related to bleesed; and one for VM developers/maintainers which can be unstable and it is related to a clone of someone
Yes, its not a big deal to set up couple more jobs.
What i like, that we can be really flexible with git, and use multiple
repositories, if needed.
Igor Stasenko AKA sig.
More information about the Vm-dev