[Vm-dev] Rant about generated files: should they stay in repository?

Igor Stasenko siguctua at gmail.com
Fri Mar 11 17:51:50 UTC 2011


2011/3/11 Levente Uzonyi <leves at elte.hu>:
>
> On Fri, 11 Mar 2011, Esteban Lorenzano wrote:
>
>>
>> yes... that's what we (well... Igor mainly) are trying to do: a common, unified way to easily build a vm.
>> So easy that even hudson can build it :)
>
> It's already done.

Where? Do you have your continuous integration server hidden somewhere,
which doing nightly VM builds and running tests, each time you commit something?
If so, then why you didn't told us before? It could save a lot of effort.

>And it could have been done with much less effort:
> Check out svn, fire up an image with a script to generate the sources
> from VMMaker, configure, make, and it's done. But you didn't like this way.
>

Of course i don't like. I don't care if it works for you. I can build
VMs wihout much stress.
And you can do that too.
Now just don't tell me that regular squeaker/pharoer can do that,
especially when
he needs to modify VM a little and generate the sources.

It never worked out of the box.. or maybe its just for me?.. maybe i
am so unlucky that i had to fix one or two things
each time i wanted to build VM. Always had a pain figuring out, which
VMMaker version could be used with which SVN revision.
And so on , and so on.

> Also note that this is totally unrelated to the generated files in the repository.
>
>
> Levente
>



-- 
Best regards,
Igor Stasenko AKA sig.


More information about the Vm-dev mailing list