[Vm-dev] VM Maker: VMMaker-oscog.52.mcz
Das.Linux at gmx.de
Sun Mar 20 18:23:09 UTC 2011
Am 2011-03-20 um 19:17 schrieb Eliot Miranda:
> On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 11:15 AM, Tobias Pape <Das.Linux at gmx.de> wrote:
> Am 2011-03-20 um 19:09 schrieb Eliot Miranda:
> > -------
> > Name: VMMaker-oscog.52
> > Author: IgorStasenko
> > Time: 18 March 2011, 12:45:14 am
> > UUID: a2810aac-4423-6740-b70e-7e821b979cb4
> > Ancestors: VMMaker-oscog-IgorStasenko.50,
> > VMMaker-oscog-EstebanLorenzano.50, VMMaker-oscog.51
> > Merge with oscog-49-51 & Esteban-50
> > -------
> > I feel like you continuously ignoring my requests to merge the code
> > base.. and work together on merged instance
> > of VMMaker.
> > If you don't like this code, just say it. But don't ignore.
> > Its not intentional. It's simply a matter of finding time to do the merge. Mariano posted a bug. I fixed just that bug and published. I'm not dissing you. I have very limited time.
> Hmm, wouldn't applying the “default” naming scheme prevent such overwrites?
> That is, now there would be
> for Elliots version and
> for Igors version.
> What would prevent us from that?
> I don't see a naming conflict. I've been using VMMaker-oscog.NN since the beginning and Igor has been using VMMaker-oscog-IgorStasenko.NN. This isn't about names, it's about content. Igor is miffed I didn't merge in some changes he made when I published VMMaker-oscog.52, right Igor?
No, you—obviously accidentally—overwrote his version of the 18th of March:
Time: 18 March 2011, 12:45:14 am
Ancestors: VMMaker-oscog-IgorStasenko.50, VMMaker-oscog-EstebanLorenzano.50, VMMaker-oscog.51
Merge with oscog-49-51 & Esteban-50
which has the same file name as yours:
Time: 20 March 2011, 9:31:20 am
Fix primitiveFlushCacheByMethod for objects-as-methods.
Since oscog is, as far as I can see, a kind-of branch of the
“default” VM-Maker, I think adding the developer initial/name to
the Package name would be in the spirit of monticello idioms.
More information about the Vm-dev