[Vm-dev] VM Maker: VMMaker-oscog.52.mcz
siguctua at gmail.com
Sun Mar 20 20:57:06 UTC 2011
On 20 March 2011 19:17, Eliot Miranda <eliot.miranda at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 11:15 AM, Tobias Pape <Das.Linux at gmx.de> wrote:
>> Am 2011-03-20 um 19:09 schrieb Eliot Miranda:
>> > -------
>> > Name: VMMaker-oscog.52
>> > Author: IgorStasenko
>> > Time: 18 March 2011, 12:45:14 am
>> > UUID: a2810aac-4423-6740-b70e-7e821b979cb4
>> > Ancestors: VMMaker-oscog-IgorStasenko.50,
>> > VMMaker-oscog-EstebanLorenzano.50, VMMaker-oscog.51
>> > Merge with oscog-49-51 & Esteban-50
>> > -------
>> > I feel like you continuously ignoring my requests to merge the code
>> > base.. and work together on merged instance
>> > of VMMaker.
>> > If you don't like this code, just say it. But don't ignore.
>> > Its not intentional. It's simply a matter of finding time to do the merge. Mariano posted a bug. I fixed just that bug and published. I'm not dissing you. I have very limited time.
>> Hmm, wouldn't applying the “default” naming scheme prevent such overwrites?
>> That is, now there would be
>> for Elliots version and
>> for Igors version.
>> What would prevent us from that?
> I don't see a naming conflict. I've been using VMMaker-oscog.NN since the beginning and Igor has been using VMMaker-oscog-IgorStasenko.NN. This isn't about names, it's about content. Igor is miffed I didn't merge in some changes he made when I published VMMaker-oscog.52, right Igor?
actully publishing my version under VMMaker-oscog.NN was attempt to
force you to stumble upon it and merge before you will release next
Instead it has absolutely different effect, worst that can be imagined :)
>From now on, i will always use
Igor Stasenko AKA sig.
More information about the Vm-dev